I have to say there are not too many erotic & sensual artists in which I fancy. After seeing the gallery of Peter Kunz, I am very impressed and absolutely adore each piece he has to show. Take a look for yourself and then tell me how amazing his pieces are.

Erotic & Sensual Art of Peter Kunz

Can you imagine 250 couples having sex at the same time? Well, now you can watch it on 500 Person Sex that was released by Japanese adult video production house, Soft on Demand (SOD) on 4th May 2006. It is the largest known sex orgy recorded.

The 130 minute video, was produced by in-house production company SODcreate, and directed by Tsuchiya Yukitsugu

Various fruits and vegetables.. Yes you read it right, according to World Sex Records women have used more bananas, zucchini’s, carrots, eggplants, squash and many other fruits or vegetables for replacement of a penis more than anything else. It is also known that a candle is actually the most widely used artificial device.. Food for thought huh..

Shake things up in the bedroom. The TROJAN® Vibrating Ring is designed to enhance the pleasure of both partners through intimate vibrations.

* Safely powered by a small battery enclosed in a soft casing

* Lasts up to 20 minutes

* Every ring is quality inspected to ensure reliability

* Raised dot adds increased pleasure

* May be used with or without a condom

* Available wherever quality TROJAN® Condoms are sold*

* Includes 1 TROJAN® premium latex condom

Tootsie.Talk

You are going to love it……

Myth: Sex toys are only for people who have a bad sex life, or no sex life

Sex Toy Fact: Sex toys are for anyone ! Bad sex life, good sex life, awesome sex life, my sex life, your sex life, sex toys are for anyone !

Myth: Sex toys are addictive:

Sex Toy Fact:Addiction implies harm, and there is nothing harmful about using sex toys (as long as they’re used properly). It’s true that people can become used to using sex toys, and even come to rely on them, but there is no “withdrawal” and anyone can easily get themselves back to masturbation or partner sex without sex toys. People who suggest that vibrator addiction is real tend to be people who think that any sex toy use is too much sex toy use.

Myth: If a woman has a sex toy, she won’t need a man:

Sex Toy Fact: Sex toys are not replacements for people. A sex toy won’t make you breakfast, or cuddle, or tell you how much it loves you. Many men are intimidated by sex toys because they have been raised with the idea that the most important thing about them is what’s between their legs. These myths about male sexuality sink in early, and as a result most men are insecure about their sexual importance. Also, let’s remember that there are lots of women who don’t want a man in the first place, and a sex toy isn’t going to change that one way or the other.

Myth: Guys only use sex toys because they can’t get any “real” sex:

Sex Toy Fact: The cliche about men and sex toys is the guy in the raincoat, buying the “masturbator” and watching porn in his basement while masturbating. The reality about men and sex toys is that millions of them use them, in one study it was 21% of respondents, both when they are in relationships and single. The best way for a man to become a better lover is to learn more about his own sexual response. Masturbation, with or without sex toys, is the key to this, and to learning to control ejaculation. Using sex toys doesn’t mean a man is a loser, it means he’s smart, and likely to be better in bed for it.

Myth: Sex toys make sex less natural:

Sex Toy Fact:Most of us are raised being told many lies about sex among them that “natural sex” means one thing only. Is drawing less “natural” when we use a pencil and paper? Is painting more “natural” if we use our own blood, rather than paints? Of course not. Yet sex is somehow less “natural” if we use tools and toys to make it different. Sex toys are animated not by batteries but by our imaginations, and using sex toys is as natural as the people using them.

Myth: There are bad sex toys and good sex toys:

Sex Toy Fact: With the exception of a few sex toys that pose obvious risks, there is no such thing as a “good” or “bad” sex toy. Sex toys are whatever we do with them. A vibrator that would be too strong, too heavy, and painful for one person might be perfect for another. A dildo that feels sticky and looks weird to one, might be the ideal shape, size and texture for another. The trick is to find the sex toy that’s right for you, but most sex toys will be good for some people, and bad for others.

Myth: The more you pay for a sex toy, the better it is:

And the more you keep thinking this, the more money you are going to waste. Yes, there are some fabulous, very expensive sex toys on the market today. That does not mean that the toys that are cheaper do not work. I have a 40 dollar pocket rocket, and it works just as good as the 200 dollar one. No doubt

Myth: Sex toys are kinky:

Fact: Words like “kinky” and “normal” are completely relative and while they may govern what you feel comfortable talking about (or doing) in public, the sooner you realize that everyone is “kinky” behind closed doors, the happier and less stressful your sex life will be. Sex toys don’t make sex kinky, and using them doesn’t “say” anything about the kind of person you are, other than the fact that you’re the kind of person who feels worthy of sexual pleasure. Which is a highly respectable reputation to have in any social circle.

Myth: Sex toys can cause damage to your body:

Sex Toy Fact: A lot of things can damage your body. Sex toys of course can be included in that scenario if you use them in ways that should not be used. You cannot take a 10 inch dildo that has no balls and stick it completely inside someone ass without losing it. Chances are the ER doctor will be removing it. Use your brains with this one. Commen sense is all you need. Sex toys do not cause our bodies damage, we do.

Is it for you?

All you have to do is sign up, and then continue signing in after each sexual encounter that you have. It makes a calender for your eyes only..

The whole purpose of BedPoster.com is “”Ever wonder how often you get busy?”" !!

So go check it out and come back here and tell me if it works for you !!

“It doesn’t look right,” said forty-two-year-old Carla Westman*. “Like I’m uneven, like one side is larger than the other and as I’ve gotten older, I think one side is stretching. Before I could close my legs and you couldn’t see anything but now one side peeks through just a tiny bit more than the other, and that just bothers me.”

To clarify, Westman, a pharmaceutical rep from Phoenix, Arizona is feeling old. More to the point, she’s blaming her vagina, or labia to be exact. And bizarre as it may sound, she is not necessarily alone.

According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, approximately a thousand “vaginal rejuvenations” were performed in 2006 — the most current year for which U.S. statistics have been compiled — up 30 percent from 2005. In the United Kingdom, the number of labiaplasties performed doubled between 2000 and 2005, reaching over eight hundred procedures per year. While these accounts may be nothing to write home about yet, the limited data available (no one database records all instances of Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery) do suggest that the procedures, and the demand for such, are growing exponentially.

“The search term labiaplasty is one of the highest searched things that lead to somebody finding me on the Internet,” confirmed Dr. Scott W. Mosser, a board certified plastic surgeon based in San Francisco, who has been performing labiaplasties for the past four years. But despite the high traffic to his website, Dr. Mosser only performs about a dozen labiaplasties per year, leading him to speculate that people are less than comfortable with the procedure.

Said Dr. Mosser, “When we look at all the other procedures [that I do], the amount of individuals who search them is pretty proportionate to the actual amounts of individuals who come in for a consult. That tells me that labiaplasty may be a little bit in the dark; that women are nervous about it; or maybe it’s an area that’s perceived to be a little bit of taboo.”

What is labiaplasty?

For those still unfamiliar with the procedure, labiaplasty involves the surgical reduction and “beautification” of the labia. Women typically request the procedure for a triad of reasons. These include both visual and physical complaints ranging from discomfort during exercise and vaginal intercourse, to discomfort simply from wearing clothing, in particular when the labia minora get caught between the elastic folds of underwear, to complaints like Westman’s, where women are dissatisfied with a lack of symmetry, discoloration, or the appearance of their labia in general.

Dr. Mosser admits that while there is no true dirtiness to having labia hypertrophy, there does seem to be a psychological desire amongst women to have their genitals look organized or clean. “There is a real trend towards sort of a perception of a clean look, whatever that means, that is associated with youth,” said Dr. Mosser. Nonetheless, he is adamant that anything that is distracting enough to interfere with a person’s quality of life or lifestyle is something that should be addressed.

Is Porn Pushing ‘Ideal Genitals’?

Others, however, are not so convinced.

“Society has changed across the last little while to a context in which cosmetic surgery in general and cosmetic procedures in general have become incredibly normalized,” said Dr. Virginia Braun, a psychologist from the University of Auckland specializing in women’s health and sexuality, and the current co-editor of Feminism and Psychology. “But our knowledge of women’s genital anatomy is still not — we’re not a hundred percent there yet.”

Dr. Braun is one of a handful of doctors and professionals who are adamantly, and radically, opposed to labiaplasties as well as other forms of FGCS like vaginoplasties and hoodectomies. Both vaginoplasties, which involve the “rejuvenation” or tightening of the vagina, and hoodectomies, also called clitoral unhooding, are meant to enhance sexual pleasure (and neither, it bears mentioning, are performed by Dr. Mosser).

To hear Dr. Braun explain it, there is a huge lack of knowledge surrounding genital diversity for women. “Women who have nose jobs or breast enlargements have a huge pool of comparison to draw from. They’ve seen probably thousands of noses every day, and even though we maybe don’t [often] see naked breasts, we certainly know what breasts look like.”

So where are women like Westman, who yearn for their vulvas of yesteryear, drawing their comparisons from? As Dr. Deborah Tolman, a professor of social welfare at Hunter College School of Social Work and author of Dilemmas of Desire: Teenage Girls Talk about Sexuality puts it, “What happened in the last three years to make women’s labias so big that they can’t walk around with them?”

If the accounts from surgeons and the media are to be believed, pornography is a major influence in what women believe is desirable. While women might not be trading notes on their vaginal proportions, they have become increasingly comfortable with mainstream pornography and that leads to one dimensional representations of what vulvas look like. Add to that the phenomenon that is the Brazilian Bikini wax, where all but the smallest trace of pubic hair is removed, and women are getting the HD version of their vulvas outside of a biology class for the first time.

Controlling Women’s Bodies

The phenomenon, argued Dr. Tolman, is just another means of asserting externalized control over women’s sexuality; testament to the profound dearth of education that both women and men have about women’s bodies.

“It is in only such a vacuum that such notions of what are good and right and normal can be insinuated,” she said. “If we have other regularized ways, and by that I mean ongoing knowledge and discussion about what women’s bodies are really like, then it would be much harder for this kind of thing to sneak in and start to look normal.”

Both Dr. Braun and Dr. Tolman speak from a social constructionist perspective, where desire is understood as a learned behavior, and is not something innate or biologically wired. In other words, people learn to desire such procedures. FGCS, said Dr. Tolman, are commodities to be consumed. We learn to become consumers of surgery:

“We don’t want it. I mean we think we want it. It feels like we want it … but I think that the observation that this has only been going on for the last couple of years is testament to how this has not been a ‘forever’ quality of women’s lives.”

Then what with all the women who truly feel as though FGCS will better their quality of life? Are we simply to ignore them? Tell them that they don’t really know, or understand for that matter, what they really want?

“Individual choice is not the only criterion,” argued Dr. Leonore Tiefer, an associate clinical professor of psychiatry at New York University School of Medicine and Albert Einstein College of Medicine. According to Dr. Tiefer, it is the publicity surrounding cosmetic services that generate discontent. For example, medical makeover shows like Dr. 90210 create a context for which women learn to become dissatisfied with their bodies and genitals, and start wondering how they to might benefit from the procedures, which according to the shows’ doctors, promise better sex for both women and their partners.

Said Dr. Tiefer, “I do not condone doctors having free reign to advertise labiaplasty without scientific evidence of its benefits and lack of long-term harm. Nor do I condone doctors having before-and-after photos on their websites because of the lack of popularly-available information about the range of normal labia.”

As one of the foremost critics of “disease-mongering” trends in the medical management of women’s sexual problems, Dr. Tiefer maintains that while the rhetoric of choice and sexual pleasure around FGCS may legitimate and promote the procedures, all FGCS really produce is a generic model of women’s genitalia. Even worse, it pathologizes female genital diversity. So enraged is Dr. Tiefer, that in 2000 she founded The New View Campaign, an organization devoted to stopping all form of FGCS. The group compares FGCS to Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).

Understandably, most people find that comparison shocking. By and large, individuals from outside the specific cultures that perform FGM regard the practice as foreign and incomprehensible. But, points out Dr. Braun, “In both cases, what’s being done is that women’s genitalia are being altered to conform to a certain set of notions and expectations about what genitalia should look like, what they need to look like if they are to be appropriately feminine and appropriately desirable.”

Even the narratives of women who have undergone FGM and FGCS are similar, with women saying things like, “this is important to me to have genitals that look normal, that look appropriate, that are right,” said Dr. Braun. And although there are big differences as well, some of the same sorts of ideas about norms of what bodies should be like, and that woman’s genitals are an appropriate place to intervene, run across both.

Women’s Choice: A Question of Quality of Life

Nonetheless, Dr. Mosser doubts that the woman with labia hypertrophy who is uncomfortable engaging in intercourse, and is uncomfortable walking down the street, and is uncomfortable looking at her naked body in the mirror, would agree with the comparison. That person, said Dr. Mosser, “would consider it not to be an external pressure but a correction of something which will improve her quality of life.”

Either way, women like Westman would do best to get to know their genitals as they are and should be. If nothing else, it’s a whole lot cheaper.

Premium Sex Portal..

Site is awesome..

http://premiumsexportal.com/